Recently I read a few forum threads talking about how strict stock photo sites can be with their submissions. Only accepting a small percentages of those submitted to them.
Part of the reason though is people coming up with the same old thing. There is probably a million and one photographs online of pretty beaches. And you can replicate this for so many other topics. The microstock agencies simply don't need them.
But it has made me think about what the future may hold? Obviously editorial photos are much more sustainable because of the nature of them. But for regular stock, it may be different. In a few years will we reach a point whereby a photo exists pretty much of anything and everything. Will the microstock sites pretty much sack off accepting new submissions when they already have databases containing vast quantities of files?
Perhaps we will reach a stage where we work on a system whereby no normal new submissions are accepted because everything already exists. And then separately the agencies have a 'required' list of current types of photographs they need and then you can only submit those. They could also run a customer section of 'wanted' threads so they know customers want a new unique image.
Perhaps this system would work better. Rather then lots of photographers constantly submitting more and more of the same stuff that is already out there. This would save the photographers time, and the microstock sites a lot of time as they would need less reviewers and it would be less intense on their servers saving them money on their costs.
Who knows what the future holds for this industry. But one thing to be sure of, over time it will probably change.
Blogs are a place where site users can highlight their favourite images, share tips and ideas, or explain in detail the ideas behind their work.
Opinions expressed in blogs are not necessarily those of site admin.